Reading: Facebook’s list of VIP users can break rules “without any consequences,” leaked documents show
many replies to the pinch include the criticism that Stone is spinning the situation, and not addressing parts of the reputation, such as the stagger amount of sag posts that go unreviewed because of the belittled XCheck easing team. Facebook Policy Communications Director Andy Stone has already tweeted a reaction to the Wall Street Journal report on XCheck. Stone has noted that the leak documents used for the WSJ piece appearance what the chopine is already aware of and working on. “ And the number they found for 2020 was north of 16 billion. ” In the WSJ Podcast on Facebook inner files, Jeff Horwitz shares the sum of views bad posts from protected XCheck accounts were getting after they should have been removed : That makes for a goodly jazz band. When combined with the pursuit of some of the Facebook VIPs, contented that technically violates Facebook ‘s own community standards can have a huge impact. “ For a choice few members of our community, we are not enforcing our policies and standards. Unlike the respite of our community, these people can violate our standards without any consequences. ” Internal Facebook documents leaked to the Wall Street Journal describe a VIP-list platform called XCheck. According to those documents, the program shields certain users when their posts are flagged for inappropriate content.
Neymar Jr. after testifying in 2019 sexual abuse and rape allegation case. © IMAGO/ZUMA Wire/xPauloxLopesx
In 2019, VIP exploiter and soccer asterisk Neymar district attorney Silva Jr. published the name of a woman who had accused him of rape, arsenic well as a nude photograph of her. Because his Facebook history was on XCheck, Neymar Jr. ‘s post was not immediately removed after it was flagged for inappropriate content. At first, due to these protections for VIP accounts, the post was not even able to be manually deleted, although FB employees tried. finally, 24 hours and 50 million views late, and the station was removed. The Facebook policy on this for regular users is crystal clear. Given that it contained “ nonconsensual nakedness, ” the ease up post would be deleted and the account that posted it removed. however, Neymar ‘s account was never touched, in direct contradiction of the caller ‘s own policies.
The leak documents explain that the Neymar incident appears aboard more than a twelve early incidents that Facebook employees were keeping track of. Andy Stone ‘s response to the reputation only leaves more questions open. “ We have fresh teams, new resources and an overhaul of the summons that is an existing work-stream at Facebook, ” he tweeted. What is the size and typography of these new teams ? And what is being done about the unreviewed 90 % of sag posts from XCheck accounts ? Most importantly, what is the new process and how is it different to the former one ?
